X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <592CFDF2.9070208@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 07:06:58 +0200
From: "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110429 Fedora/2.0.14-1.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-help] Thank you verry much, next Idea - IPC proof
References: <20170515111111 DOT 1ba62f47 AT debian> <CAJZxidAk2Ur3B1Hox5_iWJGXiLyYZZXikJnnjxUt_kXUL==CQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20170516163211 DOT 2d920db6 AT debian> <CAJZxidDBoc+HdL9VvCSfuytMTO+g=kLiicJ6HrJSeuo-BCQDgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20170529010708 DOT 29be8939 AT debian> <20170529022113 DOT GB12397 AT stuge DOT se> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1705290458510 DOT 27212 AT igor2priv> <20170529105730 DOT 72ab2144 AT debian> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1705291138000 DOT 27212 AT igor2priv> <592C88FB DOT 7090202 AT xs4all DOT nl> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1705300506290 DOT 27212 AT igor2priv>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1705300506290.27212@igor2priv>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com

gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 May 2017, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via 
> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
>>>
>> Why private ?
>
> Because I asked so. I'm a geda* list member since the mid 2000s, I 
> know how things can get done and how they get derailed.
>
> If he wants this feature to be implemented in a pcb-rnd parametric 
> footprint, we'll need to have a productive, constructive discussion 
> about some details. You may like it or not, you may agree or disagree, 
> but my experience is that such a thing is more likely to happen in 
> private than on geda-help@. (Derailing has already started, just read 
> back the last few posts in the thread.)
>
> In other words it's just my decision on how pcb-rnd feature requests 
> are done, just like your decision is using launchpad for pcb. Looking 
> at how many feature requests we handle succesfully, it looks like my 
> model is efficient.
>
>>
>> So we can all benefit ?
>
> All pcb-rnd (and related) code are public. The only thing that can 
> keep you from the benefits is your own decision.
>
> Parametric footprints are almost 2 years old. All related code was 
> public all the time. If any new code is written for an IPC-smt 
> parametric footprint, it will be public from day 0 in our public svn.
>
> Does pcb support those parametric footprints?
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor2
>
>
Good reasons.

Success ;-)

Kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.