X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <592C88FB.7090202@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 22:47:55 +0200 From: "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110429 Fedora/2.0.14-1.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] Thank you verry much, next Idea - IPC proof References: <20170515111111 DOT 1ba62f47 AT debian> <20170516163211 DOT 2d920db6 AT debian> <20170529010708 DOT 29be8939 AT debian> <20170529022113 DOT GB12397 AT stuge DOT se> <20170529105730 DOT 72ab2144 AT debian> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 May 2017, Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via > geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> I have the problem, that i have to justify the dimensions of footprint. >> I must quote a normative. >> >> The IPC is the first that i know and that i can use. >> My QA guy ask my for such a standard. > > I am happy to add features requested by active pcb-rnd users. As I > said, an IPC-smt parametric footprint is cheap, I could do it in a > hour or two. But it needs active user demand before I allocate time on > it. > > 1. become an active pcb-rnd user > > 2. make your feature request > > 3. test the feature > > Please contact me in private if you are interested. > > Regards, > > Igor2 > Why private ? So we can all benefit ? Kind regards, Bert Timmerman.