X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:06:18 +0100 From: "Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] pcb-rnd INS Message-ID: <20170308140618.1271944c@debian> In-Reply-To: References: <20170307114356 DOT 7446795f AT debian> <20170308111842 DOT 64a1f5a2 AT debian> Organization: Individuum auf blauem Planet X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v28D6OKX020641 Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Am Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:36:54 +0100 (CET) schrieb gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via > geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > Another one. > > > > > > 1. I use the debian unstable pcb-rnd > > 2. I try to work with this version while i make a symbolic link: > > /usr/bin/pcb-rnd <- /usr/local/bin/pcb > > so i use psb-rnd with xgsch2pcb. > > > > > > The want to use the tool INS for replace a ?32deg? line to > > a 45deg line. > > But the system offering only a 90deg line. > > I move the pointer around the Target-Point like in pcb, but nothing > > happens. Only 90deg. > > > > Is there a change in the usability of INS? > > I think you need to turn on the all-direction-lines to get anything > useful out from the INS tool. I am not sure it can do 45 deg in > non-all-dir-lines mode. > > I am not sure how this works with current mainline. > > My plans on this with pcb-rnd is that I want to decouple insert from > move: an insert should only insert a point, and should not start any > other operation implicilty. Sometimes I just want a point to snap > other things to. It'd also bypass the all-direction-lines problem > mentioned above. > > Regards, > > Igor2 > > No, all_direction_lines generates no 45°lines. There is no reason to use all_direction_lines on combination with INS. Because the result will be chaos. I think im a advanced user. Im now in the position to use excessive the INS-Function in combination without all_direction_lines and without orthogonal_move, because the result are clean lines in 0°,45°,90°,135°,180°,225°,270°,360°. Please do not remove this feature!!! I think this is essential for clean lines. Many normatives force you to use None-90° lines. The only clean angle without 90° is 45° for a clean EMC solution.