X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NRMAAW0ipChlvmkprGJGSvkvtl3jZBNoBX2gp/2Msmg=; b=kvdTw4YWlSe1ei4KwGLzp+UI94owVmCt27mtGwfjjJUu6zoMWyGlK8gscw47jDQJAm raYU5TFb73eBNlXZS2tW2bywXaGNFwYAb6CG1aVM1+QFMXW6CBeiOjGXlOaXPNL0QUqX lyM5g5xHqUHgzo9NqOEY/cfhdwqJDp6QD852cq/HRP98fUSDzU+lt3hPzQRlafl6Dg55 WMSaxiH6MTyel0hmJD+OONxHIR6+dBLpej/kV0YdXAZoRFvP2cCRE7Tp8DWRvS8j9yaz mPlw1vITjnbYEcBXcYUNhRcGjTjkH2i6jh8XA6HQKEj6yg/4ooP7ipU966TuwWPqrw8m /UlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NRMAAW0ipChlvmkprGJGSvkvtl3jZBNoBX2gp/2Msmg=; b=tbTMLyiqNH3UeiuMCsus55tcj94mUttZSitQkfNXUHjdN0+xyxgyHZT48DOLfE6IZX oFBaHNLL8F0RRDYjkCtmtpUklkETPglpf3hgk3ugnpmM4vjL7tVwyGPqXAnbF4FDawdI 3fEyDTMezoxiYz3tocQOCL4/osFTezSvWuc/YWCGJm5QRxAZloIZ3g+/KTXmK+XyG2zQ fxpiEn6gUoJPnPOLy1klul7kq3rvYjkwiJ/6Qbj3BENmscqym+tvbOyqDTh/7ChO8L/e VjlVi5WnpPHkzO3gY52LYtYWaV684BQJ5z+k9iBh58YsenXwKNq2AW1uR9LAeHUtzN+L MwdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lYuDppzsg3+KtEdE/BoV/piEdQkacX5m2fvA8h5VYDMMnu1+R7yYDvRUSPIWLsAA+zqefa7n2ASjrpFg== X-Received: by 10.28.127.13 with SMTP id a13mr133065wmd.96.1486107995446; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 23:46:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170201190901 DOT 7796c45d AT debian> <2A68D8FB-6CAA-40E5-8265-571627133EE4 AT noqsi DOT com> <58936E2E DOT 1090905 AT videotron DOT ca> <057B1612-5761-4C54-A2A5-2FF26E89832C AT noqsi DOT com> <20170202201255 DOT GB16844 AT localhost DOT localdomain> From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:46:34 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-help] pinseq To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v137kbM6002962 Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 2/2/17, John Doty wrote: > > On Feb 2, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:13:11AM -0700, John Doty wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 10:36 AM, Ian Chapman (ichapman AT videotron DOT ca) [via >>> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >>> >>>> I always wondered what pinseq was all about so for PCB layout only use I >>>> can forget it? >>> >>> You still need it for slotted components. >> >> No, it is unnecessary, at least for current released (un)stable >> geda-gaf and current mainline pcb (I cannot verify any older >> versions though). > > So you’ve changed the way slotdef works? That’ll break a lot of projects... No, I've not changed anything as concerning pinseq. Though you're right (thank you for this point) and I was most likely wrong, sorry. My mistake is that I quickly searched for pinseq in gnetlist sources, and pinseq is also used in internals of libgeda for slot processing. So yes, it is required for slotted parts. Vladimir