X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:11:34 +0200 From: "Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] What about pcb 3D? Message-ID: <20160729111134.6843f27f@debian> In-Reply-To: <579A6396.1090707@xs4all.nl> References: <20160728160349 DOT 0f8ad066 AT debian> <201607281516 DOT u6SFGlr5021254 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <16f0d12b-3776-add0-203a-3ce36b981f95 AT prochac DOT sk> <20160728180032 DOT GA32252 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <71096f86-db9d-b5dd-6ac1-4f4e1e1826c2 AT prochac DOT sk> <579A6396 DOT 1090707 AT xs4all DOT nl> Organization: Individuum auf blauem Planet X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Great, im Happy about the movement in pcb. PCB is my favorite tool. I like it, and i hope, it will get more useful. Thanks Am Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:57:10 +0200 schrieb "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" : > Milan Prochac (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > On 28. 7. 2016 20:00, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via > > geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 07:33:34PM +0200, Milan Prochac > >> (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> ... > >>> There is still work in progress (not very intensive due lack of > >>> interest). > >>> Simple height definiton (combined with automatic outline > >>> detection) is also > >>> on task list. > >> Don't expect much interest... > > > > I do not expect too much interest, but I also do not expect so > > active rejections from devs... Export filters really do not hurt, > > they do not touch rest of codebase and can be easily carved out in > > case they become unmaintained. And few users could benefit from 3D > > export filter for 3 years already... > > > >> ... and don't anticipate many users/developers will help you until > >> your code is released. Then you'll perhaps have some feedback. > > > > It resides in my maintained private branch (it's much better than > > lot of unmaintained LPxxx branches), because it was rejected in > > 2013, 2014... not my patches, but the whole idea of OpenSCAD > > exporter (in favor of STEP exporter) and due announced "significant > > HID rewrite"... > > > > It's common habit that some patch or new feature is placed in > > LPxxx branch and then rot there. First releases of OpenSCAD filter > > can be found there too. But it is impossible to maintain too much > > separate LPxxx branches, which never find their way to mainstream. > > That's why I collected all my work in one single maintained private > > branch. > > > > So what you expect from me to "release the code"? > > > > I really do not have time to fight with key holders, who refuse any > > improvements to keep the PCB mainstream compatible with their > > outdated private branches. I think that problem of PCB is not the > > lack of new developers, it's fear of them. > > > >> I was thinking you're already in the gEDA developers team on > >> launchpad. I hope some of the pcb developers would add you to the > >> team (if you want, of course), and that you already have the > >> developer privs in the pcb repository. Is it so? > > > > No, I am not. I have only "junior" access. > > > > Milan > > > >> If not, then ... Hey, Pcb devs, what do you think of this? > >> > > > > > Hi Milan, > > I will review and test the OpenSCAD exporter (before?) this Sunday > and if all goes well merge into master. > > I hope you will assist me when problems and/or bug reports arise ;-) > > Kind regards, > > Bert Timmerman.