X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=r03DQA606xEmJU96eYEpx03oLQMYkVFhAdSGMez09EE=;
        b=XwkVaRLwUoApjg/81/T5gvQjlG0hL5P+CPlSyczbjO7hvewPVG2gmYdabCEDl4iMx5
         bO/mQN730sw/So177ajkNc6R3dPvsrGb/fsmlygPJna+Gq5aiI40qoD+CGLeRX016ZPZ
         AgoM1UTWvTYUtjdvNF9Lwz0etFrwG7yQrYfMkwicBwqCz/e29S4seyzdXbcinl1Vu8Qp
         vYiTsOuDDbJDDj3jYlIKs97GbmHScDPsZiVbnW4WqF6d2uilbk8NRycz1p9zU+UVU2Id
         x7AX3DGFUOY2ki7lnd7SdTyYvUZrrV6twq8Jk3szo2KyMJDRaXh35eMQk9wjeEpWz/0S
         6fKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=r03DQA606xEmJU96eYEpx03oLQMYkVFhAdSGMez09EE=;
        b=mlLzjAPTJcae22C2gW/xLs566hkbbJ9CJSZY+LFFgcBxuDSSSs0CmCR+7CBHNmYooP
         7YWn+Piho5FprniVjQKeTLyhXqnXWUN1MEsAQn66ksSaJrV39iocabPsIDptiyZvlODp
         PjhdXFJDOJYRQnShuzz6UiVg2E/fo9tppNWgLHAeD5LdCQqAbttXlzdM1dLH9a1bN/lv
         AUJ1cRJDzl1uErDKCj9h1cbzCQA9aHhFzvaairNcSV4r+BmqIfSTNkVVEs6AOdKY9ahY
         D8hJ9NrAXJ2QaacvHdmEpXRbW8Mtos4cURl9N7bUZbff/d5jAGzaC4xFUJVWEF/lKHlw
         +WIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUAoqmUjfrWyxty0azaOJWr3LMcFkJ1qNpeuNoUNpIVxE2KVtWXQOJ75dXINQ/rjJI2/gZqbfH4gE4/FtlO27YKQ9uGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.68.66 with SMTP id u2mr16660039obt.49.1453039689585;
 Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:08:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJXU7q9WF4gnpLePWN9537ihz4TEv3O6WmJS1jyfz5OGGF5-_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1452944656 DOT 2933 DOT 13 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<CAJXU7q8t12_7HrR7n460BPSXHKXjyU1eVVBGPQQdmoaefHqeVA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1453038487 DOT 2933 DOT 74 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<CAJXU7q9WF4gnpLePWN9537ihz4TEv3O6WmJS1jyfz5OGGF5-_w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:08:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJXU7q9DE2xyGxWw+OjzXxi6RbPFDMKB6p=vddYquu6ggctUBA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-help] Geda-gschem update problem?
From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1fdfe8ada050529882a7e
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--e89a8fb1fdfe8ada050529882a7e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

As a guess, I'd suggest uninstalling all the gEDA packages you can find..

dpkg-query -l "*geda*"

Should give you a list

Then either choose to leave the PPA in place, and try installing what you
need.. or remove it.

apt-get update first to make sure all updates are current, after changing
the repository, and before trying to re-install.


Looking at this:
https://launchpad.net/~mehanik/+archive/ubuntu/geda-unstable/+packages

It seems the amd64 builds have been failing, so that may be the source of
your problems - I'm not sure.

Peter


On 17 January 2016 at 14:00, Peter Clifton <petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com>
wrote:

> I'm not familiar with that PPA, and can only say that unofficial PPAs are
> not a recommended way to obtain gEDA software.
>
> Peter
>
> On 17 January 2016 at 13:48, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via
> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via
>> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] schreef op zo 17-01-2016 om 12:42 [+0000]:
>> > It sounds like the repository you pulled from may have a mix of
>> > versions. (Perhaps a broken, or incomplete build, or a package that
>> > changed names?)
>>
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> I'm using the following ppa, on a Linux Mint 17.2 distribution (64-bit):
>>
>> deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/mehanik/geda-unstable/ubuntu trusty main
>>
>> Should I disable this source, remove the current geda-gaf packages, and
>> reinstall geda-gaf from another source? I'm a bit wary of messing around
>> in this way -- in my experience, it sometimes breaks more than it fixes.
>> For this reason, I decided to ask for advice first instead.
>>
>> It is also a bit puzzling that I appear to be the only one experiencing
>> trouble -- could it have something to do with Linux Mint itself? I'm
>> having some other weird problems with gschem lately, possibly related to
>> the GTK+ version in this distribution (see
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/1485199 ).
>>
>> Anyway, I'd very much like to have a working installation again, and
>> preferably a rather recent one. If all else fails, I can always compile
>> gschem from the git source myself, but I prefer to install it through
>> package management.
>>
>> Thank you for your reply and for any advice already,
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Richard Rasker
>>
>>
>

--e89a8fb1fdfe8ada050529882a7e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div>As a guess, I&#39;d suggest =
uninstalling all the gEDA packages you can find.. <br><br>dpkg-query -l &qu=
ot;*geda*&quot;<br><br></div>Should give you a list<br><br></div>Then eithe=
r choose to leave the PPA in place, and try installing what you need.. or r=
emove it.<br></div><br>apt-get update first to make sure all updates are cu=
rrent, after changing the repository, and before trying to re-install.<br><=
br><br></div>Looking at this:<br><a href=3D"https://launchpad.net/~mehanik/=
+archive/ubuntu/geda-unstable/+packages">https://launchpad.net/~mehanik/+ar=
chive/ubuntu/geda-unstable/+packages</a><br><br></div>It seems the amd64 bu=
ilds have been failing, so that may be the source of your problems - I&#39;=
m not sure.<br><br></div>Peter<br><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br>=
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 17 January 2016 at 14:00, Peter Clifton <span=
 dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com" target=3D=
"_blank">petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc soli=
d;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I&#39;m not familiar with that PP=
A, and can only say that unofficial PPAs are not a recommended way to obtai=
n gEDA software.<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br><br></fo=
nt></span></div><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">Peter<br></f=
ont></span></div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><div class=3D"gmai=
l_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 17 January 2016 at 13:48, Richar=
d Rasker (<a href=3D"mailto:rasker AT linetec DOT nl" target=3D"_blank">rasker AT lin=
etec.nl</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-help AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank=
">geda-help AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:geda-h=
elp AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-help AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt;</span> wro=
te:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-=
left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Peter Clifton (<a href=3D"mailto:pete=
rcjclifton AT googlemail DOT com" target=3D"_blank">petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com<=
/a>) [via<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:geda-help AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-help AT delori=
e.com</a>] schreef op zo 17-01-2016 om 12:42 [+0000]:<br>
<span>&gt; It sounds like the repository you pulled from may have a mix of<=
br>
&gt; versions. (Perhaps a broken, or incomplete build, or a package that<br=
>
&gt; changed names?)<br>
<br>
</span>Hello Peter,<br>
<br>
I&#39;m using the following ppa, on a Linux Mint 17.2 distribution (64-bit)=
:<br>
<br>
deb-src <a href=3D"http://ppa.launchpad.net/mehanik/geda-unstable/ubuntu" r=
el=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://ppa.launchpad.net/mehanik/geda-u=
nstable/ubuntu</a> trusty main<br>
<br>
Should I disable this source, remove the current geda-gaf packages, and<br>
reinstall geda-gaf from another source? I&#39;m a bit wary of messing aroun=
d<br>
in this way -- in my experience, it sometimes breaks more than it fixes.<br=
>
For this reason, I decided to ask for advice first instead.<br>
<br>
It is also a bit puzzling that I appear to be the only one experiencing<br>
trouble -- could it have something to do with Linux Mint itself? I&#39;m<br=
>
having some other weird problems with gschem lately, possibly related to<br=
>
the GTK+ version in this distribution (see<br>
<a href=3D"https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/1485199" rel=3D"noreferrer"=
 target=3D"_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/1485199</a> ).<br>
<br>
Anyway, I&#39;d very much like to have a working installation again, and<br=
>
preferably a rather recent one. If all else fails, I can always compile<br>
gschem from the git source myself, but I prefer to install it through<br>
package management.<br>
<br>
Thank you for your reply and for any advice already,<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Richard Rasker<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--e89a8fb1fdfe8ada050529882a7e--