X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=a9JPCjTaIRGFqgoavGR2GNX7YIwE9AiNvDEUPK1nD/E=; b=BTA4ZXbjBlgNiiXoTw1pYm11DNRQrQ05PV4uZJopOnNIP6KCIv/FWaDYNCpnGZgg3v tapyOm137fYahHcHk3s09MkUehpEnhGIV8kS6/RV6QQuxH/w2U6TNDU25IAMq5M5WnW6 FXeMLTEsAyBGMbnGXCjPCyULRTFLfH6eudcic7ZTA1rYgSOlitdmbtVF/Wh9Cf1AvbVQ qMBq3uatB7BjKCHStGZTQFKMLnMXTWfRu3ie11zMKkb3gW2eygc8Lqx+T3N08VWiOp6H HEE7jLihfFBU8DkJ4GQQD7YYXWcXk8T4sUTxVCpQAwg1TiB/3m0VClyRu2yH6cDcdhLc hLzg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.120.130 with SMTP id lc2mr639357lab.15.1441325107868; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:05:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 18:05:07 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: [geda-help] Fwd: question on copper pours with auto-routed tracks From: "Dave Williams (dave DOT williams DOT lists AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012293d60f7c6b051ee0a74e Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --089e012293d60f7c6b051ee0a74e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Been using PCB 20140316 for layout and I notice that if I auto route tracks then create a pour around these tracks they will always connect to the pour. Even if Settings -> New lines, arcs clear polygon is checked. But if I manually route these tracks, then create a pour, I automatically can get clearance (no connection to the plane) if Settings -> New lines, arcs clear polygon is checked. And I can get no clearance (a connection to the plane) if Settings -> New lines, arcs clear polygon is not checked. Bottom line is that routes that have been auto-routed seem to work differently then routes that have been manually routed - when it comes to copper pours/planes. Is there a setting or settings I need to use? Dave --089e012293d60f7c6b051ee0a74e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Been using PCB 20140316 for= layout and I notice that if I auto route tracks then create a pour around = these tracks they will always connect to the pour.=C2=A0 Even if Settings -= >=C2=A0 New lines, arcs clear polygon is checked. But if I manually rout= e these tracks,=C2=A0 then create a pour, I automatically can get clearance= (no connection to the plane) if Settings ->=C2=A0 New lines, arcs clear= polygon is checked.=C2=A0 And I can get no clearance (a connection to the = plane) if Settings ->=C2=A0 New lines, arcs clear polygon is not checked= .=C2=A0

Bottom line is that routes that have been auto-r= outed seem to work differently then routes that have been manually routed -= when it comes to copper pours/planes. Is there a setting or settings I nee= d to use?=C2=A0
=
Dave=C2=A0

--089e012293d60f7c6b051ee0a74e--