X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=LbFuZHS9yDNCdnPrzmTkIk8pAH4wk8g3d9a1peNcgMs=;
        b=KEqEquPrXLX6on1vP4YjpsOlX21iqR0vzB+uTyCKpYhbutvEqM5ItSgJM9E23MF2CC
         eDMLQhoAAKv2KVASfYLjxkirlStqQLhoDGHiYjj62Vh//I8Rbrp1MFpofyYXOmue0bMo
         KpNN+aOda7sLhsxLSWWPqoP++3HEQCpViuloDtJh443sVHCdvD0PjsjirEp057zZv78f
         xKiVTNd9FRiYx2m9fX06hyCFC4aIjgWAlF4YhmgO4a9kBiVLse1N3ZLWCQzz2BDi8BT4
         EiSNKrvW6b9+t7v43jlk2D3WWV6cnTlMKuMZfdGXkLHwp7yvEP4uTluQyhJ+Fx0rse3M
         JbDQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.248.201 with SMTP id yo9mr57348996wjc.31.1438101635515;
 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhTF3f442e8AoeGN0J391__annyVP0uC8B+RmfU448tFTw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAONhAosa8509VEWHQ_BUFp5iu9RA_65m8EzfZ-YMqDMJMpNZAw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTnp1Qxg5nOhWTGsbB1-rmdXg2fTKc3PWAGU9fp8sT8LQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAONhAotg6DOCj_Bd13gouNcX+Z25ZzpqXOyy4NENuBckGe1-QA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTF3f442e8AoeGN0J391__annyVP0uC8B+RmfU448tFTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 18:40:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CAONhAovwMjpqEWSQLmDjiawu_Zq9dWtStDe1ux+Sh_nPCjepwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-help] Strategy of adding netname attributes in gSchem?
From: "=?UTF-8?B?Q3PDoW55aSBQw6Fs?= (csanyipal AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6SGedf8030595
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

2015-07-28 17:55 GMT+02:00 Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Csányi Pál (csanyipal AT gmail DOT com)
> [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> 2015-07-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
>> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>:
>>> I don't mean to stomp on your dreams but there is an ethical concern
>>> here. You are very likely to harm bats. 60KHz is the centre of here
>>> hearing frequency.
>>
>> I agree with you.
>>
>> I think: a quiet music could be nice, but a loud music could be
>> harmful to peaple.
>> This may be similar to bats, don't you think?
>
> That is not how it works plus your device basically makes a pure tone
> not music. I work for people who study hearing loss.
>
>> I read somewhere that that some mosquitos are able to produces sound
>> frequencies of 60 kHz, when they mate.

I think if I repell mosquitoes from the place where I am, then bats
goes after mosquitoes ( to eat them ) so I am going to be free of
mosquitoes as well.

> Yes and that is part of why bats use that frequency.
>
>> This could be music for bat's ears if it is quiet, don't you think?
>
> More likely it will add to their already noise polluted environment.

So what is your suggestion about this device called mosquito
repellent? How could it bee environmentally friendly for baats and for
as, humans?

-- 
Regards from Pál