X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=tbFgikdIwEtUbUtQcjgixgM8EbN0U8ETsCV9sdRzOHk=;
        b=g4jCcMFxPOM1twnNg+hxAePRp64A2SjYwaGxsv3xC0em57uQGYZkXAUKvUSn69HI8i
         7bdKQOF8usKGSSrxCUTPxmngQm3hMlrdVxezLURb7DgC741SqcU4WQCKh6yzB7yjYmzG
         Ckr9W+7Sql7e2ynZ6fKsV8GSyaHG1yDEH+G6mpTKbhta/Rz3qCs/feQ6cO9iNq1hg9KX
         2zoq87u5DgjfQtsmwWxcmqmctFvju2bxg42STmuiKWxl07c8h2mQ52koAG/wNm15ZATL
         gEXBJfvjDAASbp/AZ68hxtSGvDFfnOrjZ2W+32nEDSPLThTg2UfaOhAoA12390i7cUmw
         LWYg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.201.72 with SMTP id jy8mr29157966lbc.65.1416244280178;
 Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:11:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhT9xu6xi8qFD_cJJZJYTo+hqA77u_AnmSoNA-jeDYrBmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+CyYa1zaMNquy-seoR23r0Ztg_NOHhe7naXmVs6VwjZ=HtpCA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5468F15C DOT 2030907 AT hallowell DOT com>
	<CA+CyYa1_XBy2U78MOAruncvf4JbLAQ=-qdXT=gTw9=p1W43U6w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAAhxy3C8fOuC2pSjknxpbD6ER9szoNwOaiO5OHntZXrEh1U+1Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201411170252 DOT sAH2q386004662 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT9xu6xi8qFD_cJJZJYTo+hqA77u_AnmSoNA-jeDYrBmA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:11:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhQP29KbhToP7S+B8Q+KDd8QDVrk_JCe8BVTMq5kXS2W3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-help] Multiple supply voltages
From: Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I think it would be better to have filters in the symbol search box
that you could apply based of a setting in gafrc or gschemrc. That way
users could block out symbols of older style versions.

Personally I am just glad to escape extra symbol drafting. I can't
care how the styles are mixed as long as it is still readable.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Doesn't that risk breaking things for people who did not embed symbols
> into their designs?
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:52 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>
>>> They should be removed, or better yet fixed!
>>
>> Please feel free to volunteer to fix it :-)
>
>
>
> --
> Home
> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
> Work
> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/