X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rQbK2LmddcvzJT+kuyUF8cWQEswUidrxKZRVTB513YM=; b=De36D1Lg+HMIwT03jik9go1GXaQCoc3GqqeeAOevuUX31rZf9YhfvcY3or7rwmoKbd RjUbfQR+Ylu35RauwExWLVyUeWbrJNdasdzQ+7ijpR8MajFV7ywBgp9Q6tFWSBVngnyh WhNra/9S4LUsJMcRoZJxPK50vHy+crQMwlIgylzwqAoPRKaRBHCy4c8nkQIS30sYlIgd JQyYPjsmYxdNRZ81e/WTCtj9O026wYKMHj77chUWbeqpHBrPElxgSVLTgV4e65NrlYG9 36IKxZy35vcwmjHZomtdnCaY2O7gFY0AMHihepLxHuMrRn28IMiuL5bfIi1RWZXNoVVO YYWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.57.17 with SMTP id e17mr16318336igq.10.1399689481602; Fri, 09 May 2014 19:38:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <535D2368.6070500@mochima.com> References: <535D2368 DOT 6070500 AT mochima DOT com> Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 22:38:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-help] How do I know if my symbols are "good enough" From: Cyrus Vatan To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2354fd58cbc004f9029af9 Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --e89a8f2354fd58cbc004f9029af9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It is suggested that symbols that do not have slots have numslots=0 in the guides online, however the exact syntax is unclear to me, so if anyone figures that out id love to know. As for footprint, if you prefere "heavy" symbols, ie symbols with lots of defaults, i like to put in "unkown" so i have a placeholder and don't need to fiddle w/ visibility settings when i use the symbol. When i feel really fancy and know i have accurate footprints for a part, i include them all in the default, this allows me to delete them when used in a schematic, saving me needing to look up the right footprint for a device, but that is probabl bad practice for shared symbols. On Apr 27, 2014 11:35 AM, "Carlos Moreno" wrote: > On 14-04-27 08:55 AM, Neill Hogarth wrote: > > OK. That worked. Thank you for the quick answer. > > > > Received two errors > > Warning: Missing footprint= attribute > > Warning: Did not find numslots= attribute, not checking slotting > > > > The first one I understood. I did not create a footprint. > > But the second one I don't understand. > > Slots is for the components that have more than one "item/unit" > within a package. For example, a dual or quad operational amplifier. > I find it a bit strange that it issues a warning for something that is > the "normal" situations --- most components do not have slots; many > do, but I don't find it reasonable that it gives you a warning because > your symbols does not use slots. Sounds to me more like a > "Notice" or an "FYI" rather than a "Warning". > > Regards, > Carlos > -- > > --e89a8f2354fd58cbc004f9029af9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It is suggested that symbols that do not have slots have numslots=3D0 in= the guides online, however the exact syntax is unclear to me, so if anyone= figures that out id love to know.=C2=A0 As for footprint, if you prefere &= quot;heavy" symbols, ie symbols with lots of defaults, i like to put i= n "unkown" so i have a placeholder and don't need to fiddle w= / visibility settings when i use the symbol.=C2=A0 When i feel really fancy= and know i have accurate footprints for a part, i include them all in the = default, this allows me to delete them when used in a schematic, saving me = needing to look up the right footprint for a device, but that is probabl ba= d practice for shared symbols.

On Apr 27, 2014 11:35 AM, "Carlos Moreno&qu= ot; <moreno+geda-help@= mochima.com> wrote:
On 14-04-27 08:55 AM, Neill Hogarth wrote:
> OK. That worked. Thank you for the quick answer.
>
> Received two errors
> Warning: Missing footprint=3D attribute
> Warning: Did not find numslots=3D attribute, not checking slotting
>
> The first one I understood. I did not create a footprint.
> But the second one I don't understand.

Slots is for the components that have more than one "item/unit" within a package. =C2=A0For example, a dual or quad operational amplifier.<= br> I find it a bit strange that it issues a warning for something that is
the "normal" situations --- most components do not have slots; ma= ny
do, but I don't find it reasonable that it gives you a warning because<= br> your symbols does not use slots. =C2=A0 Sounds to me more like a
"Notice" or an "FYI" rather than a "Warning".=

Regards,
Carlos
--

--e89a8f2354fd58cbc004f9029af9--