X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <535D66DD.1080009@mochima.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 16:21:49 -0400
From: Carlos Moreno <moreno+geda-help AT mochima DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-help] Which Debina-Package do I have to install? make geda-gaf
 git version 1.9.1-20140308-80-g62aede2 under Debian Wheezy fails due to missing
 glib.
References: <535A1445 DOT 4060108 AT philippklostermann DOT de> <20140425093528 DOT 24599 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <4ec21d206984a3bc291bb9baefc33eb8 AT net2air DOT co> <20140425094534 DOT 25362 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <423b9c44d06df6dd5da8d70cf885a813 AT net2air DOT co> <535CEB5C DOT 8050304 AT philippklostermann DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <535CEB5C.8050304@philippklostermann.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Added-Header: 
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com


For some reason I can't find the original post, so please forgive me
if I'm going over something that you already covered in the previous
posts.

Two details come to mind:

(1)  You are clear that you do need the development packages when
compiling from source, right?   That is, the package name ending in
-dev   (you may have already said that you knew that, but I can't find
the original post, so just in case I thought I'd mention it)

(2)  At some point, when I was trying to install from source on Ubuntu,
which should be almost identical to what you have with Debian, I had
to manually create one symlink in /usr/lib or /usr/local/lib --- ldconfig
failed to create it, and I was going insane with the error  "library xxx
not found" when I could see the libxxxx.so file .....  But there was one
of the symlinks missing; not sure which one;  it was probably the .so
the one that was missing; that is, I had libxxxx.so.2.1.0, then
libxxxx.so.2
as a symlink pointing to .2.1.0, and there was the .so missing, which
should be the symlink pointing to libxxxx.so.2

Hope this helps!

Carlos
--