X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=3I6v/rb0LICNuLSf+tsmRoPYqVpEFuPnn3vU/FG2IVo=;
        b=w5XVxTmdBWrfHZZvWpInsXd0a9TuPZ2G0viqJgjHI4FRGfp3Vfngp5NZt5Y7BiR73Y
         zu/mC80l/8TifLvOsWXxbBI+M0up1byty6Um9MV3bxwT1n4l6dli1S7yLvrUXus1RmQo
         9BdSJnchoD2+gzeq+Tc9561fvSZEjYOkG+7EngK78TO+4XYM6prumzG45r/tlKYP+/SG
         lXvbJhibXUHLXAWl92tPT0DfNsGt4BsHISJg9UGgvNmVX7uIGEjgqNQt2KL2od3SpgRe
         OHn7l7jWp8gB+P+CEuLHM/sO/rKEvMrvQ4yuJlBASTrZa2NiF5uUHMKgYltq/uPg9w/E
         V2tw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.44.115 with SMTP id d19mr4538340igm.1.1397834362537; Fri,
 18 Apr 2014 08:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhxy3AXKsY5HDyYMAYU2QZ9g_8VmSgtQxQT8m9Vh+JfJJL5gg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAhxy3Bm+KvP3m2zO9sn6MGswfwjemcuAFOTafuso7NZjGmOkA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAAhxy3AXKsY5HDyYMAYU2QZ9g_8VmSgtQxQT8m9Vh+JfJJL5gg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:19:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAhxy3D3LHmeyWdfuz0fS1vm9r8NA4fORirTjJ9TbTZgW87dkA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [geda-help] Alphanumeric pins a lie?
From: Cyrus Vatan <vatan DOT uml AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f839515a24b5d04f752ac72
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--e89a8f839515a24b5d04f752ac72
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Returning new user to gEDA, and first time user of mailing list so i hope
ime doing this right.  Anyways my issue is with pins with letters for pin
numbers failing to have rats attached to them once imported into PCB.  Is
this a bug or am i using it wrong?  Example would be a transistor with a
pin w/
Pinnumber C
Pinseq 1
Pinlabel C
Pintype pas

when i put it into a schematic it seems fine, and gsch2pcb does not
complain of any unconnected pins which i thought it used to do, but that
seems to be my imagination.  However there will be no rats connected to
that pin when oened in pcb, athough everthing else seems fine.  The
documentation clearly says pin num can be alpha numeric... any guidance
appreciated.

--e89a8f839515a24b5d04f752ac72
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>Returning new user to gEDA, and first time user of mailing list so i hop=
e ime doing this right.=C2=A0 Anyways my issue is with pins with letters fo=
r pin numbers failing to have rats attached to them once imported into PCB.=
=C2=A0 Is this a bug or am i using it wrong?=C2=A0 Example would be a trans=
istor with a pin w/ <br>

Pinnumber C<br>
Pinseq 1<br>
Pinlabel C<br>
Pintype pas</p>
<p>when i put it into a schematic it seems fine, and gsch2pcb does not comp=
lain of any unconnected pins which i thought it used to do, but that seems =
to be my imagination.=C2=A0 However there will be no rats connected to that=
 pin when oened in pcb, athough everthing else seems fine.=C2=A0 The docume=
ntation clearly says pin num can be alpha numeric... any guidance appreciat=
ed.</p>


--e89a8f839515a24b5d04f752ac72--