X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <1355415774.1739.54.camel@hoho6.chidig.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-help] Dirt Dumb Level..
From: Bob Gustafson <bobgus AT rcn DOT com>
To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:22:54 -0600
In-Reply-To: <CANqhZFxNUdeXr-Fsed6VJ2dwkzOQxzJh87GtY+uJRsWJi=x2qg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1355360621 DOT 1739 DOT 45 DOT camel AT hoho6 DOT chidig DOT com>
	 <1355205873 DOT 14812 DOT 39 DOT camel AT hoho6 DOT chidig DOT com>
	 <1763693 DOT MV8q8EB28b AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
	 <1355342881 DOT 1739 DOT 13 DOT camel AT hoho6 DOT chidig DOT com>
	 <3323134 DOT U0L5kasnFv AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
	 <20121213012835 DOT 29523 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	 <1355376162 DOT 1739 DOT 47 DOT camel AT hoho6 DOT chidig DOT com>
	 <CANqhZFxNUdeXr-Fsed6VJ2dwkzOQxzJh87GtY+uJRsWJi=x2qg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net)
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 10:49 +0000, Gareth Edwards wrote:
> On 13 December 2012 05:22, Bob Gustafson <bobgus AT rcn DOT com> wrote:
> > I think it was Peter TB Brett who wrote that >> >
> 
> He did, and he wrote it to you. The implication of the statement was
> that if you are /not/ running gaf 1.9.0 of newer, you will not have
> the gaf command. Peter Stuge was trying to get you to confirm the
> version of the software you are running.
> 
> Cheers
> Gareth

Ahh, ok

[user1 AT hoho6 ~]$ gschem --version
gschem: invalid option -- '-'

Hmm, but.. The nifty logging window gives:
gEDA/gschem version 1.6.2.20110115

I'm using Fedora 17 and this version is the latest blessed by the
distribution and/or debugged enough upstream..