X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ekiPOVk8RLFkxOTm9nUYaIzx5lptViGgbRbCOtH1+6s=; b=iO5QJduYwzWb/+5s/lz1S9fsTbZ9SFeu0XO47hZlu/IXeybwnYNSJ02za5uIaHxn9V BhX8a/Gnl9SJGm8yD66wjq3WenRp0NT4cZC72MxPhFaepOhw4aeLxosqyY9LmybOMcW6 u5XqS/YoEehNBm0CAWCv9cfTVIcFgW7bSIlFM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201202151829.q1FITZgo006033@envy.delorie.com> References: <201202151829 DOT q1FITZgo006033 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:16:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-help] How can I route multi-pad signals? From: Luis Emiro Linares To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q1HGGLsL014034 Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Thanks for your advice. The chip is the FDMF6707 DrMOS module from Fairchild. I'm doing the PCB footprint and the gschem symbol. I have now the following questions: 1. Could you please elaborate on how, if the pads have different pin numbers, the autorouter will know? 2. For the gschem symbol, Is it valid for me to define a multi-pad signal (i.e. PGND) by setting its pinseq and pinnumber both equal to a comma-separated list of the pad numbers to which it corresponds in the footprint? On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:29 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I have made the footprint of a 40-pad QFN chip + 3 hidden pads >> underneath. There are 6 signals that are to be connected to several >> of the pads, both on the border and underneath the package. Is it >> possible to instruct the PCB autorouter about this multiple >> connections? > > In general, if the pads have different pin *numbers* [*] the autorouter > will know that they all need to be connected. > > However, I've found that it's often better to hand-route the traces > *under* the chip first, and let the autorouter take care of the rest. > Likewise, the autorouter isn't that smart about power/ground nets, > since they usually have different rules than regular signals.  I do > all my bypass caps and power/ground planes first, fan out any > problematic pins, then see how the autorouter does. > > For more specific help, you'll need to tell us which chip it is :-) > > > [*] i.e. same label, different pins, vs overlapping pins/pads with the >    same number forming one oddly-shaped "pin" -- Luis Emiro Linares García ------------------------------ Físico - Ingeniero Electrónico Universidad de los Andes Bogotá D.C., Colombia.