X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 19:09:03 +0300
Message-Id: <83mue6lzds.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <bf9153a9-d741-d081-8dac-8c51b4789a19@yandex.ru>
	(djgpp AT delorie DOT com)
Subject: Re: cwsdpmi borland compatible? possible! (Re: [PATCH] exec: fix
 inversions in leak detection logic)
References: <964e3268-2f75-ee73-ab5a-b01bf1aadb98 AT yandex DOT ru>
 <qjb14m$1kqj$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
 <7209026e-1f1b-e590-00a3-4ed1a424cc0d AT yandex DOT ru>
 <qjfkbp$1o2c$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
 <bd347f78-b176-6992-291c-2e542241efa1 AT yandex DOT ru>
 <d97686df-50ba-5210-519a-abd80f2d190f AT yandex DOT ru> <838sr87yty DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <bf9153a9-d741-d081-8dac-8c51b4789a19 AT yandex DOT ru>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Sorry for the long delay.  Charles replied yesterday that the second
version posted here looked harmless to him.  Here's his exact words:

> The second version looked harmless to me.  Based on a flag which
> could be set it would change the cleanup behavior slightly. [...]
> Of course the only way to know for sure is build with it and make
> sure it doesn't break normal test cases.

So I guess we are okay with the second version of the change, thanks!