X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:13:19 +0300
Message-Id: <83tva1ddhc.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <5D618105.9020108@gmx.de> (djgpp@delorie.com)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: fix inversions in leak detection logic
References: <964e3268-2f75-ee73-ab5a-b01bf1aadb98 AT yandex DOT ru> <qjb14m$1kqj$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org> <7209026e-1f1b-e590-00a3-4ed1a424cc0d AT yandex DOT ru> <qjfkbp$1o2c$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org> <bd347f78-b176-6992-291c-2e542241efa1 AT yandex DOT ru> <qjgf7r$1b15$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org> <83d0gzlxgq DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5D618105 DOT 9020108 AT gmx DOT de>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 20:25:09 +0200
> From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> > That is true, but OTOH there's no special need to refuse the change
> > up front.  If the change doesn't cause any trouble to the CWSDPMI
> > based setup on DOS, and helps some other environment do something
> > useful, why should we refuse to make simple changes?  I see no reason.
> 
> I agree with this and thus it is time to bring this issue to an end.
> The proposed changes do not break a CWSDPMI based DJGPP setup on DOS
> thus I see no reason why the changes should not be accepted.  If I do
> not get a proof until tomorrow that the patch below breaks something
> I will commit it.

Charles Sandmann just replied to me in private mail saying he was back
from vacation and will catch up on this discussion soon.  So if you
didn't commit these changes already, perhaps wait a bit longer for his
review.

Thanks.