X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Received: by 10.157.12.213 with SMTP id o21mr24823098otd.21.1463501165926; Tue, 17 May 2016 09:06:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.42.182 with SMTP id c51mr1006155qga.7.1463501165893; Tue, 17 May 2016 09:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 09:06:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8d49fc45-0a00-4b22-af5b-6d841492c1f3@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.24.106.115; posting-account=Q0wMHAoAAADjYrghh94FTf6YnbpTqZgp NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.24.106.115 References: <201604281739 DOT u3SHdF9o009018 AT delorie DOT com> <572B61D5 DOT 2040400 AT gmx DOT de> <16909c8a-d835-21ab-67fb-9dcd397b630b AT iki DOT fi> <572F7363 DOT 10503 AT gmx DOT de> <2e24511c-70d0-42fd-e7bb-15cb7c265c25 AT iki DOT fi> <33c66609-1021-0a49-be8c-42428cdaca41 AT iki DOT fi> <9039c19a-0630-4789-a282-71b83d95d665 AT googlegroups DOT com> <8d49fc45-0a00-4b22-af5b-6d841492c1f3 AT googlegroups DOT com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <0b6e8a96-8022-435c-8ecc-e0fd8e6e7dca@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] DJGPP port of gcc-6.1.0 From: "RayeR (glaux AT centrum DOT cz) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Injection-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 16:06:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Bytes: 2024 Lines: 6 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u4HGF1W5022445 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Is ar.exe the only binutils program that needs a larger transfer buffer? Yes for FFMPEG (rm.exe is from fileutils and make is from make package). I never tried to rebuild GCC from sources. I had this problem (too many files was processed during build process) some years ago and I don't know if there was some recent change to handle small TB at runtime as DJ told. Maybe it's no longer needed...