X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: "Martin Str|mberg (ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Is DJGPP Emacs still wanted? (was: GCC 3.4.6 -gcoff produces executable without line number info) Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 07:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <83bn4uxben DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <837ffix9o7 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5722455F DOT 3020906 AT gmx DOT de> <831t5py22r DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <57228FEC DOT 9080408 AT gmx DOT de> <83mvocx0iw DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> NNTP-Posting-Host: WLZdEp4S2PR09rkVF8ILdg.user.gioia.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse AT aioe DOT org User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64)) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Bytes: 1752 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > Do we still want/need to build latest Emacs versions with DJGPP? 1. If I'm using DJGPP and need editing files, I use emacs. 2. If I have a working DJGPP installation, I'd probably use emacs instead of MS miserly programs for editing other things. 3. I used DJGPP mainly to mess with DJGPP, code for DJGPP libc and Freedos. Occasionally I needed some C program I made also in WINDOWS, so some very seldom other usage. 4. Today I never find time to have fun with DJGPP or Freedos (there are other more fun things) so 1-3 isn't relevant. 5. Any DJGPP emacs would work for me. I don't need the latest. 6. If I ever need DJGPP again, I hope there some emacs compiled with current DJGPP there for me. 7. Thank you Eli, Andris and Juan for the porting work. -- MartinS