X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 08:38:22 +0300
Message-Id: <83mvobvepd.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <5723FA0D.8030709@gmx.de> (djgpp@delorie.com)
Subject: Re: GCC 3.4.6 -gcoff produces executable without line number info
References: <83bn4uxben DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <837ffix9o7 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5722455F DOT 3020906 AT gmx DOT de> <831t5py22r DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <57228FEC DOT 9080408 AT gmx DOT de> <83oa8sx19b DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5723B974 DOT 3010800 AT gmx DOT de> <83wpnguqj5 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5723FA0D DOT 8030709 AT gmx DOT de>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 02:19:25 +0200
> From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> OK, I have to correct one of my previous statements.  The last DJGPP port of
> GDB that still offers COFF debug support to an extent that can be considered
> as usefull is gdb72br3 and can be downloaded as:
>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/deleted/beta/v2gnu/gdb72br3.zip

Thanks.  Was gdb72br3.zip built with DJGPP v2.05?  I'd like to avoid
having to use subtly incompatible binaries, if possible.

If it is a v2.05 build, IMO it should be moved to current/v2/.

> I have found in my backup DVDs a port of GDB 7.0 I have produced in Juni 2015
> and that I have never uploaded for some reason that I do not remember anymore.
> That port behaves identical to gdb72br3.  If you think that your GDB archive is
> better than gdb72br3 or my port of GDB 7.0, please let me know and I will download
> it and produce a new port.

Thanks, I will try 7.2r3 and let you know.