X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22307.43184.240302.252132@turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 03:32:16 +0900
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull AT sk DOT tsukuba DOT ac DOT jp>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Is DJGPP Emacs still wanted?
In-Reply-To: <83mvocx0iw.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83bn4uxben DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<837ffix9o7 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<5722455F DOT 3020906 AT gmx DOT de>
	<831t5py22r DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<57228FEC DOT 9080408 AT gmx DOT de>
	<83mvocx0iw DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 21.5  (beta34) "kale" dcd7dca8d70b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-apple-darwin15.2.0)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: steve AT turnbull DOT sk DOT tsukuba DOT ac DOT jp
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] writes:

 > So please tell me if these efforts are still needed.  Does anyone use
 > a DJGPP Emacs for their routine work, on DJGPP or anything else?

I haven't used DJGPP based Emacs since early 1996.  It's been a
tour-de-force that you've kept it running all these years, and I for
one am deeply impressed that you've managed it, but honestly, I can't
imagine that anyone depends on it any more.