X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:44:45 +0300 Message-Id: <83k2jgwseq.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (djgpp AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: Is DJGPP Emacs still wanted? References: <83bn4uxben DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <837ffix9o7 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5722455F DOT 3020906 AT gmx DOT de> <831t5py22r DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <57228FEC DOT 9080408 AT gmx DOT de> <83mvocx0iw DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:58:43 +0300 > From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" > > Speaking for myself, I never needed nor used djgpp port of emacs. Thanks for the feedback.