X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 10.224.59.205 with SMTP id m13mr35002969qah.7.1369059662407;
        Mon, 20 May 2013 07:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.41.1 with SMTP id b1mr1519626qel.18.1369059662334; Mon,
 20 May 2013 07:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 07:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <Roidnc6h2rL7w-rMnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.181.199.10;
 posting-account=Q0wMHAoAAADjYrghh94FTf6YnbpTqZgp
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.181.199.10
References: <201304061704 DOT r36H4k48018021 AT delorie DOT com> <c46f36b4-f175-40b5-aeb9-2713a57fab95 AT googlegroups DOT com>
 <3728e704-b839-4ad6-998e-d3aab686b649 AT googlegroups DOT com> <Roidnc6h2rL7w-rMnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d AT earthlink DOT com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <12d60e38-9778-4463-b914-396c2a62273f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU binutils 2.23.2 - stack size
From: RayeR <glaux AT centrum DOT cz>
Injection-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:21:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Bytes: 1716
Lines: 4
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r4KEj1nk014429
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Aha, so no way under DPMI 0.9 to implement classic grow-down stack? But you can allocate block of memory at specific address range (or not?) - near top of memory. Hm, you probably mean tthat this block cannot overlap heap area so there's fixed boundaries of this blocks... 
I know CWSDPMI support some functionality of DPMI 1.0 but not this?