X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 20:18:24 -0400 Message-Id: <201205200018.q4K0IOcM012213@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <026d3524-1b2f-405b-987c-db3a7dcf7dbe AT n42g2000yqm DOT googlegroups DOT com> (message from Rugxulo on Sat, 19 May 2012 16:38:41 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: incompatible References: <442a0 DOT 580acc3b DOT 3ce7635b AT aol DOT com> <83txzdstc1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <8c35d644-ede1-4b87-8c60-ebf6a0db0513 AT hq4g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com> <201205191813 DOT q4JIDulU002792 AT delorie DOT com> <026d3524-1b2f-405b-987c-db3a7dcf7dbe AT n42g2000yqm DOT googlegroups DOT com> Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com > Yeah, you wanted to write a 32-bit OS, right? Yup. > I'm sure other DOS extenders existed, but of course DJGPP was > probably the first free one. DJGPP (go32) was written because the existing one didn't have virtual memory, and gcc required more memory than I had RAM at the time. > You mean 32-bit apps under 16-bit Win 3.x? Yes. > There's still plenty more that could be done. But I guess talk is > cheap, so if someone (like me) wants to do something, he better roll > up his sleeves and get to it, show the code, submit patches, > etc. (Easier said than done.) Yup to all that :-) > Sorry, DJ, but apparently the world disagrees with you: the more the > merrier. ;-) Just because they disagree with me, doesn't make them right ;-) > P.S. Though seriously, I think building DOSEMU atop minimal Ttylinux > wouldn't be a bad thing, would it? One of these days I'll have to > try .... Start with a Linux kernel, run a custom environment on it. You don't *have* to use a distro ;-)