X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: "[HCI]Mara'akate" <emoaddict15 AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: CVS, SVN, or GIT on DJGPP and DOS
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <6dbee42d-85d6-4196-96aa-c0bab02ed408@m4g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
References: <3646e568-9961-4802-8daa-13e18e695ccf AT k5g2000vba DOT googlegroups DOT com> <C0703FB0316C4F83A580DCF41BEEEF7F AT broadpark DOT no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.254.122.149
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1326123335 1012 127.0.0.1 (9 Jan 2012 15:35:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:35:35 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: m4g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.254.122.149; posting-account=XGWx5woAAACFbFREYlembztJnxsJ2Of0
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22)
 Gecko/20110902 Firefox/3.6.22 ( ) SearchToolbar/1.2,gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 2110
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q09Fj1uR011603
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Jan 9, 8:26 am, Gisle Vanem <gva DOT  DOT  DOT  AT broadpark DOT no> wrote:
> "[HCI]Mara'akate" <emoaddic DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> >I am wondering if anyone has ported CVS, SVN or GIT to compile
> > properly on DJGPP or even as precompiled binaries for DOS?
>
> > I'd love to see a WATT32 enabled build of one of these projects.
>
> Not that I'm aware of. I don't think the network interface would be
> a problem. But the long filenames e.g. Git uses, would be. You can
> give it a try and email me privately for the network stuff; I'm still a
> bit involved with Watt-32.
>
> --gv

Well, DOSLFN does work great for most things.  Though, it's slow.  So
I am not worried about LFN usage.  I'm interested in whatever would
require the least amount of effort, since I am a bit new to this stuff.