X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:06:30 -0600 From: "Charles Sandmann" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <8a32880d-526c-40ac-a9bb-e88fce4ee2aa AT z25g2000vbs DOT googlegroups DOT com> <21258842-845d-4b87-9c29-52d0528e2ca0 AT dp8g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com> <9m1d3rFcctU1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de> <4f6d5674-a89a-4eed-a7c3-5e944257610e AT f11g2000yql DOT googlegroups DOT com> <9m3iofFpomU1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de> <4EFCDF18 DOT 8090607 AT iki DOT fi> <201112292056 DOT pBTKu6q6005225 AT delorie DOT com> <3bbc0ba1-98e5-4f8b-8e9a-6d1e8bbe8322 AT v24g2000yqk DOT googlegroups DOT com> Subject: Re: problem with AS from binutils 2.21.1 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 21:06:23 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: Lines: 33 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.91.136.221 X-Trace: sv3-pOOLTLxuS0z0kXpIkloCb4HJD06SxDH58/THInWlyEKiToWjmnPxuQ1vips5zFyBUEFyL5xWectfBqk!5gxd8H0cYgDiLMjaBqhIBPDJm3wmveuyKhy4HOBQWzgstn2vsY0Roj2YwZgS+5GBqlwAtxkBPgHB!mkO/1xB3I3Kq+AMy4cY6sdl4lyMmskdU X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3072 X-Original-Bytes: 3011 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com >> The djelf code is available as a user add-on. It is GPL and >> can be used if desired. It is not copyright compatible with >> the DJGPP project and so can't be merged into the CVS >> tree without appropriate copyright assignment. >I never heard that and haven't checked. Are you sure? Which parts >aren't compatible? The stub? (I don't have it installed locally [yet], >so I haven't messed with it recently.) ELF can't be too too hard as >even MOSS could handle it back in the day. Let me be more precise. Some of the new components have GPL copyrights. Many of the components which are relatively minor modifications of existing files retain the current copyrights and could be checked in. It might be possible to support ELF linking without the full package. It might also be possible that the GPL portions of the code are not needed or could be segregated into packages away from libc. >Anyways, did DJELF support debugging? unexec? I know fixing GAS + LD >are the only main priorities to building GCC 4.7.0, but other stuff >probably doesn't have enough capable volunteers. There are several things that are not supported, but the core pieces needed to provide support (and support further development) are there. In particular, some of the really hard pieces (like the ELF stub / crt0) are working and retain the original copyrights. I don't have a personal need for this, but it is interesting and worth discussing.