X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: RayeR Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: problem with AS from binutils 2.21.1 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 17:09:50 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 23 Message-ID: <561636bb-1ec8-4a7b-b1d6-62e28c2f6de9@m10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> References: <8a32880d-526c-40ac-a9bb-e88fce4ee2aa AT z25g2000vbs DOT googlegroups DOT com> <21258842-845d-4b87-9c29-52d0528e2ca0 AT dp8g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com> <76df8c48-1463-43d1-98a1-4c32fb5c7643 AT t16g2000vba DOT googlegroups DOT com> <3e83fb36-219b-4314-8201-7f0047eb60d2 AT z12g2000yqm DOT googlegroups DOT com> <9metpcFndoU1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de> <1b8a3a38-882b-4056-9c3d-ed23db8ab4fb AT f33g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.45.168.98 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1325552990 6480 127.0.0.1 (3 Jan 2012 01:09:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 01:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: m10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.45.168.98; posting-account=Q0wMHAoAAADjYrghh94FTf6YnbpTqZgp User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2686 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Thanks for clarification. I didn't know there's such limit in COFF. I expected that this 32bit system hasn't much 'stupid' 16-bit limitations to care about... As a mistake I wrote that object file reached about 3,4MB but it should be size of temp. asm file (L:\WINXP\TEMP/ccOqvtFj.s) which even growed over 11MB - hard to exactly say I was observing temp directory and afer it was done temp file disappeared. So I could take in mind that number of relocations depens on optimize level and gcc version. I don't want to go back to older version. Splitting the source file is not practical. So currently I use #pragma for opt level as quick and easy solution but as Andris said it may not be possible in future (mentioned gcc 4.7). I don't understand djgpp/ coff internals to make a coff patch but it seems it will be necessary. Any idea about the waring in libc: e:/djgpp/lib/libc.a(d0e01.o): warning: previous common is here e:/djgpp/lib/libc.a(d0600.o): warning: multiple common of `___dpmi_error' I can found only definition in DPMI.H extern unsigned short __dpmi_error; I don't have libc sources and didn't compiled it but I use updated version by Ozkan Sezer.