X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Bash bugs (was: djgpp/libreadline bug) Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 30 Message-ID: <45780149-957b-4e1a-9c91-fc01b4f040e4@y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> References: <013d25d6-f34d-4686-9c68-0de775d5bf59 AT t20g2000yqe DOT googlegroups DOT com> <83oci71dhr DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <11fa369b-5fab-42ac-805f-1e7e74051411 AT l36g2000yqb DOT googlegroups DOT com> <83fx3j1874 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <81255c92-b71b-4d8b-871c-fe057d72ddb7 AT u22g2000yqf DOT googlegroups DOT com> <834ojz111c DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <9e95b163-ba8a-467d-870e-4f3437dd9a96 AT y17g2000yqd DOT googlegroups DOT com> <1433b3f4-9d44-455b-9465-e873fd2cb618 AT 33g2000yqj DOT googlegroups DOT com> <8d449cf5-3dce-48c8-b8e7-e535b037b4a6 AT 8g2000yqz DOT googlegroups DOT com> <83zl1oxzat DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <81hah9Fit3U1 AT mid DOT individual DOT net> <4BB4C8EC DOT 8050909 AT iki DOT fi> <83r5mywcqy DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1270232478 27097 127.0.0.1 (2 Apr 2010 18:21:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.5.22 Version/10.51,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3395 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On Apr 2, 1:10=A0am, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Rugxulo > > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:23:22 -0700 (PDT) > > Bytes: 4549 > > > The Autoconf people explicitly target only POSIX, if at all possible. > > That's not accurate: they explicitly cater to environments such as > Cygwin and MSYS which run on Windows. =A0And at least in the past, when > DJGPP was actively developed, our voice was also heard. > > Besides, DJGPP is sufficiently Posix for that matter, anyway. They told me that they didn't even have old Bash 2.05b (circa 2003?) around to test. In their minds, everybody should've upgraded (which ignores the obvious fact that it's heavily *nix-oriented and makes use of fork / exec and other goodies that are annoying to us). While they do use some workarounds for various targets, they want to avoid that if at all possible. And, sadly, DJGPP is not very prestigious, so it's not high priority. If we have bugs in our copies of Bash, we alone are expected to fix them. However, Ralf seems very nice and cooperative, so I can't complain. It's just a tough job for all of us. :-/ My main complaint is that so many programs out there could also support DJGPP but don't even bother (or remove DOS support for no good reason). It's one thing if it's too much work (e.g. rewrite the backend), but when it's only simple things, that just irks me to no end! The DJGPP suite is still so very useful yet so ignored.