X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <4A02976D.10808@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 11:10:21 +0300
From: Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090413 Lightning/1.0pre Shredder/3.0b3pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Which editor do you use?
References: <f1018f14-b049-48d5-90a6-1cee94bd7ca7 AT z9g2000yqi DOT googlegroups DOT com> 	<89cdd25e-6ef5-4e85-aff5-0dbcb852ca3f AT g20g2000vba DOT googlegroups DOT com> <647a1e03-3910-424d-a584-226f2b06fc8c AT q14g2000vbn DOT googlegroups DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <647a1e03-3910-424d-a584-226f2b06fc8c@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 05/07/2009 09:49 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On May 6, 6:22 pm, Glaux<gl DOT  DOT  DOT  AT centrum DOT cz>  wrote:
>    
>> I tried most of editors mentioned here. I like Borland styled IDE so I
>> still use RHIDE for DJGPP coding (and DOS Navigator for other files).
>> Unfortunatelly RHIDE is dead and it's doesn't work 100% well under
>> WinXP (e.g. when compile it switch to fullscreen or sometimes crashes
>> or debugger don't work with new gcc) but for me it's still the best...
>>      
> I think JED, GNU Emacs, FTE, TDE, VIM, etc. can all jump to GCC
> compiler errors via "C-x `" (backtick) or so. JED has a Borland-ish
> mode, and GNU Emacs has CUA mode. Anyways, RHIDE is internally based
> upon SETEDIT, so try that if you really want.
>
> P.S. I can't remember exactly, but I think RHIDE's GDB only works with
> COFF, so you may have to compile with "-gcoff" else it prefers Dwarf.
> When / if Eli finished GDB 7.0, that would make it that much easier (I
> assume) for someone to update RHGDB with it, if it ever gets
> resurrected. Don't hold your breath, though (but do feel free to help
> him if possible).
>    
Already with gdb-6.3 (used for my last build of RHIDE several years
ago) RHIDE heavily depended on deprecated features of GDB. I do not
thing that this will improve with upcoming gdb-7.0. Most likely some
of required and deprecated features could even be removed completely.

I myself have not used RHIDE already for several years and have no plans
to use it. As the result it is extremely unlikely that I'll could do any 
build
of RHIDE in future.

Andris