X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f In-Reply-To: <200611050505.kA5551QK025806@delorie.com> Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 CCH5 September 12, 2005 Message-ID: From: Gordon DOT Schumacher AT seagate DOT com Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:30:37 -0700 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SV-GW1/Seagate Internet(Release 7.0.1 HF29|March 07, 2006) at 11/06/2006 09:30:41 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Proofpoint-FWRule: outbound2 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=4.65.5446:2.3.11,1.2.37,4.0.164 definitions=2006-11-06_05:2006-11-04,2006-11-06,2006-11-06 signatures=0 Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk "Gerrit van Niekerk" wrote on Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:56:42 +0200: # On 4 Nov 2006 at 14:35, Florian Xaver wrote: # > I am using the inofficial "2.04" version, would it be much work tomake it # > official? I haved had never problems. It would maybe bring new life into # > DJGPP... # > # # This issue comes up from time to time. Some of the problems to be sorted out: # # http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/djgpp/2.04/status204.html # # As I understand it, the real problem is that there is nobody # willing/able to act as a release manager. Any volunteers? I can't step forward right at the immediate moment, because I'm beyond up to my eyeballs in trying to get the software I work on released for my organization. But my department (in both its current incarnation and in its previous one at Maxtor) have both made great use of DJGPP over the last few years, and once I get things a little more stabilized, I'd like to step forward to do that. I've had initial discussions on the topic with my boss and he gave an initial okay, once this big push is past.