X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: rugxulo AT gmail DOT com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: GNU sed 4.1.5 w/ GCC 4.1.0 -- fails
Date: 11 Sep 2006 16:28:10 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <1158017290.233809.66390@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1158017295 1852 127.0.0.1 (11 Sep 2006 23:28:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 23:28:15 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246;
   posting-account=qvj7NA0AAABallzf-E3FtUCXEd65I-J8
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Okay, I'll admit, I only tried to build the bootstrap version of GNU
sed 4.1.5, but it seems to not build with GCC 4.1.0 (although 3.4.4
seems to work fine).

I understand that 4.1.0 is a newer revision, more "standards-compliant"
(I assume), much faster at C++ (even if C++ objects are incompatible
with older GCCs), but I'm wondering, is it practical to suggest
everyone upgrade to 4.1.0 exclusively yet or not? So far, I've just
kept 3.4.4 and 4.1.0 both installed in separate dirs (too stupid/lazy
to try to get them both working via -V).

BTW, nice job on everything, not trying to complain.  :-)