X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Radical NetSurfer <RadSurfer AT yahoo DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: cc1 vs cc1plus
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:39:15 -0400
Message-ID: <p2vqe1dt260nfohslqdcqi2n5nrid01si2@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Velocity.Net
Cache-Post-Path: web.velocity.net!unknown AT 66-211-204-34 DOT velocity DOT net
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Lines: 28
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT newshosting DOT com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

A friend of mine tried upgrading to DJGPP v2 gcc 4.0.1,
and when he now compiles some programs, he insists that
cc1plus.exe is being called, even when the source is  .c.

Sometimes we compile from batch files we make ourselves,
sometimes, typing gcc directly from the command line!

What would suddenly cause gcc 4.0.1 to want to use cc1plus
for .c files?

gcc -s -c -m486 -O2 s1.c s2.c s3.c

Any ideas?

He's running an Athlon-K6 233mhz, Win98SE.

On my computer running the very latest packages from
DJGPP Delories ftp site, I do not experience this problem.
cc1 for .c and cc1plus for .cpp.

Some factor we are not aware of is interfearing with his
compiling gcc.

Thanks!

email: radsurfer AT yahoo DOT com