X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: "FreeDOSfan" <grup AT discardmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Standalone EXE files
Date: 7 Jul 2005 17:21:42 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <1120782102.105437.232320@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1120780438 DOT 759410 DOT 33100 AT g14g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com>
   <200507080009 DOT j6809Dpm023888 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.13.118
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1120782107 16831 127.0.0.1 (8 Jul 2005 00:21:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 00:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <200507080009.j6809Dpm023888@envy.delorie.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.218.13.118;
   posting-account=CO1wow0AAACLVBZWCVVLQkiFiAjxROdy
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

"Also, PMODE can be used as a built-in extender"

I know. Is its functionality as good as the of CWSDPMI ?

PMODE/W is considered to have some lacks/bugs - is
PMODE/DJ better ?

"A 2k stub is far more efficient than a huge built-in extender."

"huge" extender CWSDPMI: 20 KB

32-bit EXE file: * 50 KB HELLO.EXE
                 * some 100 KB average prog
                 * >1MB more complicated prog

DOS/4GW: 250 KB !!!