X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:07:44 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <01c4b378$Blat.v2.2.2$e3dbd960@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <3ZSbd.13748$nj.7977@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> (one2001boy AT yahoo DOT com) Subject: Re: latest ls.exe version in XP problem References: <6jKbd.13476$nj DOT 4016 AT newssvr13 DOT news DOT prodigy DOT com> <3qtum01b6ifo4t461j2ma065kl0k39kbfs AT 4ax DOT com> <3ZSbd.13748$nj DOT 7977 AT newssvr13 DOT news DOT prodigy DOT com> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "one2001boy AT yahoo DOT com" > Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:33:03 GMT > > Under windows, it is really not necessary to check if the file is > executable, link or normal file. It doesn't make sense. It does make sense, since ls.exe should work exactly the same as it does on Unix. That is, it should be able to show if a file is executable or not, and latest (beta) version of DJGPP supports symlinks as well. > I use ls -F for > telling if the object is file or directory only. That's not what ls.exe is for; see my other message in this thread. > I think it might be helpful for displaying the file or directory quickly > if those checkings are turned off. ls.exe already optimizes its calls to `stat' according to the switches it is given. Any more optimizations will hurt compatibility with Posix platforms, which is bad.