X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:08:59 -0400 Message-Id: <200409101808.i8AI8xL4009069@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <4141e908$0$175$cc7c7865@news.luth.se> (message from Martin Str|mberg on 10 Sep 2004 17:48:56 GMT) Subject: Re: compiling djgpp: which gcc? References: <20040909150711 DOT GC9890 AT webhome DOT cz> <20040910130940 DOT GD21756 AT webhome DOT cz> <4141e908$0$175$cc7c7865 AT news DOT luth DOT se> Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Nope. We don't have time to follow this newsgroup 100%. And if you > wanted to talk to the DJGPP developers, you should use the > djgpp-workers mailing list. That's not quite how it works. The djgpp-workers list is for talking about working on djgpp itself. It is not a generic method for contacting the workers. I don't want people thinking "Oh, I'll ask my generic C programming question on djgpp-workers because that's where the smart people hang out". I *do* want people thinking "I've got some free time and I'd like to fiddle with djgpp's C library, so I'll ask for advice on djgpp-workers". > Perhaps it's been too long or I've done it so many times, but I > think it very easy to compile libc. Just unzip the source and go > down into src and type "make". When it works, yeah, it's that easy. > This is where beginners' questions should be made. However > beginners' questions regarding libc implementation or compiling are > better posted to djgpp-workers and are welcome there. True. > Anyway there is very little activity on djgpp-workers as almost none > have any time for it anymore. So we welcome anyone that want to > correct bugs. I like to think of it as "there's little left to do because it all works so well" :-)