X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Andrew Cottrell <andspamtrap DOT aty DOT exemail DOT doty DOT com DOT dot DOT yau AT unknown DOT addr>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: compiling djgpp: which gcc?
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:05:10 +1000
Organization: HOME
Message-ID: <mbr2k0tcd4k1a7de9lhev6j6jr0k5gictq@4ax.com>
References: <20040909150711 DOT GC9890 AT webhome DOT cz>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.233.15.233
X-Trace: 1094798842 un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au 31712 220.233.15.233:1129
X-Complaints-To: Abuse, including message IDs to abuse AT pipenetworks DOT com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>do you think djgpp beta (of 2003-Nov-30) compiles with gcc 3.3.4?  I
>got this error:

.. SNIP..
>I doubt this will get better with gcc 3.4.x... :)  My bcmp.c is
>identical to current CVS version(!).
.. Good to see that you have checked, but what about the rest of the
files?
>The code in memcmp.c looks sane (as an inspiration to fix the bcmp.c),
>are you interested in a "cleanup" patch for newer gcc?  Or do you
>think it won't be that easy (so I don't waste my time trying)?  The
>beta had to be compiled with 3.2.x I guess...  Are all you developers
>using that version of gcc still? :-O
I suggest that you join the developers list and send the patch to this
list. You can join the list at DJ's site.

BTW: I haven't done a complete DJGPP build for a long time so I cannot
give any info as to shat occures with GCC 3.4


Andrew