X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn AT foot DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Microsoft  clock()
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:03:10 +0300
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <2l78r4F9essnU1@uni-berlin.de>
References: <2l4majF8iuhdU1 AT uni-berlin DOT de> <7tkse09qsl5m3v51d5rhotn98hnmb80i2n AT 4ax DOT com>
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de Sh/EdiDQ8lQC/eaVXR81MwgZLruCLN2pE/6EkwKvNogZGKzxw=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


"Andrew Cottrell" <andspamtrap aty exemail doty com dot yau> wrote in message news:7tkse09qsl5m3v51d5rhotn98hnmb80i2n AT 4ax DOT com...
> >  detected problematic behavior of clock() on Microsoft Windows.
>
> >============
> >Windows 2000
> >============
> ...SNIP....
> >So, one can see that gpp and g++ generate quite different "cumulative processor time".
> >It seems that "cumulative processor time" generated by g++ (Cygwin) is more believable.
>
> Please goto www.delorie.com and have a look back in time in the DJGPP
> workers list and you will find allot of talk about this a few years
> ago and what was done to fix it.
>
> In summary:-
> 1) You did not indicate which version of the DJGPP LIBC you are using.
> This makes a BIG difference on 2K.

DJGPP 2.03
gpp 3.3.2

[snip]


-- 
   Alex Vinokur
     http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
     http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn