X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Message-ID: <405EEF97.A98A123E@yahoo.com> From: CBFalconer Organization: Ched Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: what are you running djgpp on? References: <81f33a98 DOT 0403220228 DOT 76b111a9 AT posting DOT google DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:16:29 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.76.139.156 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1079964989 12.76.139.156 (Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:16:29 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:16:29 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com gswork wrote: > > Just a question out of interest - what spec pc are you running DJGPP > on? > > I have 2.03 running on three 'old' pc's of mine > > a celeron 500/256 ram, sitting 'under' win9x > a p166mmx/64 ram, also under 9x > a p75/16 ram, with a dos/win3.1 combo > > It's interesting to note the differences in compiling speed when i > updated each to allegro 4.03. The make session was very long under > the p75 (but the compiled examples ran very smoothly). Works fine > though. I do have an oldish win2000 laptop but that runs mingw, and > linux of course has gnu tools anyway. > > no big point here, just a nod of appreciation to the scalable and > useful DJGPP package, and wondering if anyone has it on an even more > modest machine - and what you've been writing with it recently. A '486-DX2-80 running W98 with 64 MB. -- Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. USE worldnet address!