X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:13:29 -0500
Message-Id: <200401080113.i081DT7q021456@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <bti3vp$tn8$1@au-nws-0001.flow.com.au> (bdeck@lycos.co.uk)
Subject: Re: Does using '-std=c99' with gcc 3.3.x cause '__STRICT_ANSI__' to be defined?
References: <btarqo$kgr$1 AT au-nws-0001 DOT flow DOT com DOT au> <3FF9241B DOT 2060501 AT earthlink DOT net> <btcs0a$ti5$1 AT au-nws-0001 DOT flow DOT com DOT au> <btemt9$rf4$2 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <btfhok$int$1 AT au-nws-0001 DOT flow DOT com DOT au> <ubrpgb8t2 DOT fsf AT elta DOT co DOT il> <bti3vp$tn8$1 AT au-nws-0001 DOT flow DOT com DOT au>
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Understood. Hopefuly when things start looking complete, '-std=c99' won't
> generate a definition that bypasses half the defines of the header files
> anymore :-)

Yes, it will.  If you specifically request that gcc strictly comply
with the c99 standard, all non-c99 definitions are removed from the
headers.

If you want the non-c99 stuff in the headers, use -std=gnu99 instead.