X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: gswork AT mailcity DOT com (gswork) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: win98 support termination doesn't effect dos Date: 19 Dec 2003 01:05:27 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 23 Message-ID: <81f33a98.0312190105.79f11944@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.128.229.253 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1071824728 4519 127.0.0.1 (19 Dec 2003 09:05:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:05:28 +0000 (UTC) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote in message news:... > > Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:36:43 -0500 (EST) > > From: Jude DaShiell > > > > Every version of windows I've ever used has had a dos core. > > That's not true anymore for the versions of Windows that are > descendants of the NT family: Windows NT, Windows 2000, and Windows > XP. (I'm guessing that all the future versions of Windows will be > derived from the same family as well.) > > The NT family is a complete 32-bit OS written from grounds up, not a > superset of DOS as Windows 3.x and 9x were. To support DOS programs, > NT has a DOS _emulator_ (a.k.a. NTVDM, the NT Virtual DOS Machine), > which is just another NT program. IIRC this kicked off with NT 3.1 so it's been a long time coming! OS2 2.1 was better though! I think future versions of windows are moving toward 64bit machines and slowly toward the depreciation of Win32API in favor of .NET framework. To be backward compatible a version 10 years hence will need to do a lot of emulating (but then the CPU will be so fast too)