X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: "bdeck" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: MOUNT.EXE Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:22:14 +0200 Organization: Tiscali Germany Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <7ce56313 DOT 0309220111 DOT 61b9da4a AT posting DOT google DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p62.246.38.44.tisdip.tiscali.de X-Trace: ulysses.news.tiscali.de 1064330025 41940 62.246.38.44 (23 Sep 2003 15:13:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT tiscali DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:13:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Hans-Bernhard Broeker" wrote in message news:bkpdbk$c0a$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE... > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The big drawback is that this scheme *only* applies to those programs > built with the Cygwin DLLs, and that they tend to utterly confuse your > average Windows user. Very true, but "/dev/env/DJDIR" is anyway DJGPP specific (as well as any /dev device hardcoded into applications), so I think it is pretty hard to say that we are completely free of that confusion ;-) I think it would make a nice feature, though, for advanced users. Like I said, it was just an idea. > >> Perhaps a mock 'mount' and 'umount' > >> executable could add additional devices and physical directories (even > >> commands) to the DJGPP.ENV.... > > > It would be a very bad idea IMHO to rewrite DJGPP.ENV to support this > > kind of feature. It's better to record the info on some other file. > > I'm not all that sure about this. If a feature like Cygwin's were to > be added to DJGPP, then DJGPP.ENV would be the natural place to put > it. At the very least, DJGPP.ENV would have to hold the name of the > "/etc/mtab" equivalent file, which the libc code would then look into. I thought of that, too. I guess it is a pro-and-con issue of how many system files you want floating around in the end ;-) but I think it would be logical to define all mounts in one file, and DJDIR is more or less a mount. "Eli Zaretskii" wrote in message news:u65jjy9g9 DOT fsf AT elta DOT co DOT il... > > From: "bdeck" > > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.apps > > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:00:09 +0200 > However, such extensions are private to the program that uses them. > You cannot easily have a program like `mount' mount some pseudo-device > and have that device visible in another program, unless you leave > some record to that effect on disk or something. So I guess all that is missing is the interface to exactly such a textfile ;-) Regards, Ben