Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 09:39:38 -0400
Message-Id: <200308301339.h7UDdcN4024440@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <2950-Sat30Aug2003121428+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
Subject: Re: wide character functions
References: <Kq53b.5954$L15 DOT 1502 AT newsfep4-winn DOT server DOT ntli DOT net> <2427-Thu28Aug2003000602+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <Dxj3b.94$c12 DOT 961 AT newsfep4-glfd DOT server DOT ntli DOT net> <8296-Thu28Aug2003162425+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3F4E90EF DOT 33122DA4 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <2110-Fri29Aug2003133636+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3F4FBDDF DOT 85DA1F2B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <2950-Sat30Aug2003121428+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Also, since the C standard says that the is* macros are affected by
> the current locale, they should probably be extended to support 8-bit
> characters beyond 7-bit ASCII, something we currently don't support.

We don't?  That's news to me.  The tables are 257 entries long and
runtime updateable, specifically to allow for locale-specific updates.
Our locale code doesn't do it, but the is* functions support it.