Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:14:28 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2950-Sat30Aug2003121428+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3F4FBDDF.85DA1F2B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:55:59 +0100)
Subject: Re: wide character functions
References: <Kq53b.5954$L15 DOT 1502 AT newsfep4-winn DOT server DOT ntli DOT net> <2427-Thu28Aug2003000602+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <Dxj3b.94$c12 DOT 961 AT newsfep4-glfd DOT server DOT ntli DOT net> <8296-Thu28Aug2003162425+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3F4E90EF DOT 33122DA4 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <2110-Fri29Aug2003133636+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3F4FBDDF DOT 85DA1F2B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:55:59 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> I don't understand how is* can support multibyte characters, when they only
> take an int argument.

Someone already corrected my mistake in this matter.

However, consider functions such as strupr, and you will see what I
mean.

Also, since the C standard says that the is* macros are affected by
the current locale, they should probably be extended to support 8-bit
characters beyond 7-bit ASCII, something we currently don't support.