Message-ID: <3F4FBD6B.3090202@inti.gov.ar>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:54:03 -0300
From: Salvador Eduardo Tropea <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: es-ar, es, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: bug report - RHIDE 1.5
References: <749471af DOT 0308150111 DOT 3988936a AT posting DOT google DOT com> <u3dpjvo05snu6hauav7mclhj447q6k7lmq AT 4ax DOT com> <bhir9m$2088$1 AT ulysses DOT news DOT tiscali DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <bhir9m$2088$1@ulysses.news.tiscali.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h7TLYpR26852
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

bdeck wrote:

>Does this mean that there are two compteing releases of Rhide? Is this
>binary the actual prefered version? A little confused...
>  
>
Oh, no! no, competing releases. Things are much more simple: Robert 
doesnīt have enough time to maintain RHIDE at the pace imposed by the 
changes in other tools :-(
As Iīm the author of the editor and help system used in RHIDE and Iīm 
also the maintainer of Turbo Vision (since 1998) I simply created a CVS 
branch in RHIDE CVS and checked in some important fixes needed to 
compile RHIDE with the last versions of SETEdit, TV and gcc/djgpp. These 
binaries seems to be more stable than the "stable" release. Thatīs all, 
no "competing releases".

SET

-- 
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set AT computer DOT org set AT ieee DOT org 
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013