From: "Kenton W. Mellott" <melken AT co DOT tds DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <31F3b.3654$cQ1 DOT 975803 AT kent DOT svc DOT tds DOT net> <3f4f62b4 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Subject: Re: Long file name support
Lines: 21
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <TRL3b.3710$cQ1.1010044@kent.svc.tds.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:14:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.21.9.114
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT tds DOT net (TDS.NET Help Desk 1-888-815-5992)
X-Trace: kent.svc.tds.net 1062177267 69.21.9.114 (Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:14:27 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:14:27 CDT
Organization: TDS.NET Internet Services www.tds.net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com




"Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> wrote in message
news:3f4f62b4 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu...
> > > LFN TSRs are not required under Windows 2000 or Windows XP if you have
> > > upgraded to the V2.03 refresh or V2.04 alpha test.
>
> > Is the LFN TSR needed if you can access the DOS interrupts with assembly
> > language?
>
> The built-in C run-time functions (fopen, etc) work directly with long
> names under all platforms which support the long file name DOS interrupts.
>

Is the TSR to allow one to run in the just DOS (not in a DOS window), and
still have long filename functionality?

<snip>