Message-ID: <3f3e4fcf$0$172$cc7c7865@news.luth.se>
From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject: Re: as and structs
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <3f3e2079$0$168$cc7c7865 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <bhlib8$9g8$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.6-20020816 ("Aerials") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.6Q (alpha))
Date: 16 Aug 2003 15:37:51 GMT
Lines: 34
NNTP-Posting-Host: speedy.ludd.luth.se
X-Trace: 1061048271 news.luth.se 172 130.240.16.13
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote:
: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> wrote:
:> and in y.S:
:> #include "x.h"

: That makes sense only rather rarely ...

How should I use the same constants in C source and in assmebly
source then? E. g. DEBUG in my example.

:> 1.  What should I do to make this work nicely with prototypes and
:> structs in header files?

: Enclose the C-only parts in some #ifdef, e.g. #ifdef __GNUC__ or
: whatever.

Which define makes a good C<->assembly discriminator? __GNUC__?

:> 2. Why is CFLAGS missing while compiling y.S

: Because, obviously, y.S is not a C source file!  You wouldn't expect
: the C++, Fortran or lex flags to be applied to assembler either, would
: you?

No. But for those I'd expect gpp, g77 or flex be called not gcc. In
this case gcc _was_ called, hence I thought CFLAGS should apply.

If you make make compile C++, Fortran or lex code with gcc (weird,
but...) I'd expect CFLAGS to be used.


Right,

						MartinS