Message-ID: <3f37e7ba$0$165$cc7c7865@news.luth.se>
From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject: Re: Inline assembly error
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <84e4e2a9 DOT 0308072140 DOT 47872db2 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <84e4e2a9 DOT 0308082024 DOT 59e5816b AT posting DOT google DOT com> <3f34b5c7$0$164$cc7c7865 AT news DOT luth DOT se>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.6-20020816 ("Aerials") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.6Q (alpha))
Date: 11 Aug 2003 19:00:10 GMT
Lines: 12
NNTP-Posting-Host: speedy.ludd.luth.se
X-Trace: 1060628410 news.luth.se 165 130.240.16.13
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> wrote:
: I tried to figure it out. And it's the second constraint that messes
: up. If I remove that one (Flag), the next one (PCount) makes it
: complain. This doesn't make sense.

I figured this weirdness out. Do not try 386 assembly constraints on a
SPARC. Duh!


Right,

						MartinS