From: "bdeck" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: f2c for DJGPP? Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:35:49 +0200 Organization: Tiscali Germany Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: p62.246.4.135.tisdip.tiscali.de X-Trace: ulysses.news.tiscali.de 1060165701 60349 62.246.4.135 (6 Aug 2003 10:28:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT tiscali DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:28:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Hans-Bernhard Broeker" wrote in message news:bgqj2r$jk9$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE... > bdeck wrote: > > > I looked around and found some dead links, but there doesn't seem to be a > > current release of f2c specificly for DJGPP. Is this correct? > > That may be so, but then, that's not a big problem. You can just as > easily use the FORTRAN 77 compiler provided by GCC, called g77.exe, instead. > Install g77*b.zip of the same version number and date as the gcc*b.zip you > already use, and you'll be in the game. Maybe you misunderstood my post. Does g77 have an f2c emulation mode? I did it for compatibility reasons... not really to do Fortran programming myself (I have enough to do :-) Of course I know about g77 ... as explained in my previous post, I thought netCFD specificly needed the f2c executable to build correctly, so I went through the hassle of getting the sources and built it first. The point is: does anyone else want it? If no, it's no big deal. That's all. Regards, Ben