Date: 04 Aug 2003 07:55:18 +0200
Message-Id: <u4r0y6k6x.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <76uzeozd7s3g.1sgoajp58hmqa$.dlg@40tude.net> (message from Quasar
	on 04 Aug 2003 04:13:11 GMT)
Subject: Re: Alternative to fcvt for older DJGPP?
References:  <76uzeozd7s3g.1sgoajp58hmqa$.dlg AT 40tude DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Quasar <haleyjd AT hotmail DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: 04 Aug 2003 04:13:11 GMT
> 
> I have a program that needs to compile with an older version of
> DJGPP which does not appear to have fcvt in its libc. Are there
> any quick alternatives to this function?

I'd simply grab djlsr203.zip, snip the source of fcvt from there, and
use that to compile your program.  See, it's easy with free software ;-)

Btw, what old version of DJGPP do you need to compile that program,
and why won't a newer version do?