Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:43:07 -0400
Message-Id: <200306111643.h5BGh7Gp027647@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <bc64pn$3p1$1@news.hananet.net> (ddd@test.com)
Subject: Re: Hi, is there any commercial program compiled with DJGPP?
References: <bc3vnn$bat$1 AT news DOT hananet DOT net> <ecd462f8 DOT 0306101240 DOT 61caac21 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <200306102056 DOT h5AKubnJ009675 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <bc64pn$3p1$1 AT news DOT hananet DOT net>
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> well, it's a little bit different.. how's it resolved concerning license if
> DJGPP sutff (esp. DPMI) is utilized to develop/distribute commercial dos
> application? According to legal restriction term on DJGPP application, it
> says ok just to include the infomation in product's documents on how to get
> DJGPP.
> 
> Are there any other agreements except this?

If you're using an officially released djgpp, that's all.

You also have the choice of complying with the GPL if you choose.  If
you *modify* the djgpp parts, then you *must* comply with the GPL.