Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:22:29 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Frank Donahoe <fdonahoe AT wilkes DOT edu>
Message-Id: <3791-Sun26Jan2003192228+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.A41.4.44.0301231401170.100742-100000@wilkes1.wilkes.edu>
	(message from Frank Donahoe on Sun, 26 Jan 2003 07:20:40 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: unsupported coff header
References:  <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0301231401170 DOT 100742-100000 AT wilkes1 DOT wilkes DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 07:20:40 -0500 (EST)
> From: Frank Donahoe <fdonahoe AT wilkes DOT edu>
> 
> So if djgpp 204 is not heading in the direction of a new coff header,
> the new tools seem to be taking us there.  

I think this is a known problem between UPX and the latest Binutils
releases.  I expect it to be fixed in the near future.

> In the words of Walt Kelly's cartoon character Albert, "We have
> met the enemy and he is us."

No, not us: the Binutils maintainers ;-)